Opinions Oct. 2, 2019

  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Indiana Court of Appeals
James A. Ringley v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. (mem. dec.)
19A-MF-782
Mortgage foreclosure. Affirms the Hamilton Superior Court’s order denying James Ringley’s motion to set aside the judgment entered in favor of Caliber Home Loans, Inc. Finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Ringley’s motion to set aside the judgment in favor of Caliber.

J.H. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
18A-JV-2608
Juvenile. Affirms the adjudication of J.H. as a delinquent child for committing criminal recklessness, a Level 6 felony, and criminal mischief, a Class B misdemeanor if committed by an adult. Finds sufficient evidence to support the adjudication. Also finds the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion on admitting hearsay testimony.

Antwain Coburn v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
19A-CR-435
Criminal. Remands to the Marion Superior Court its revocation of Antwain Coburn’s community corrections placement and order that he a serve the remaining two years of his Class B felony dealing in cocaine conviction, and that his Class D felony resisting law enforcement convictions be served concurrently. Finds the trial court’s order was erroneous. Remands with instructions to amend the abstract of judgment to remove the references to the Class D felony sentences.

Damon Guy Hill v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
19A-CR-1178
Criminal. Affirms Damon Hill’s five-year sentence for conviction of Level 5 felony reckless homicide. Finds the sentence is not inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and Hill’s character and that there is no reversible error.

Edward Lee Smith, Sr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
19A-PC-772
Post conviction. Affirms the dismissal of Edward Smith Sr.’s petition for post-conviction relief. Finds Smith failed to submit his findings of fact and conclusions of law on time and that the post-conviction court did not erroneously fail to follow the prison mailbox rule.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}