Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowIndiana Attorney General Todd Rokita is taking the lead in an 18-state lawsuit challenging a proposed rule from President Joe Biden’s administration that would generally consider those traveling through a third county before reaching Mexico and the U.S.-Mexico border to be ineligible for asylum.
The proposed “Circumvention of Lawful Pathways” rule would effectively replace a public health order that allowed officials to immediately remove migrants, including people seeking asylum. The order’s Title 42 rules expired in May.
But Rokita and other states on the lawsuit — including Florida, Iowa and Kentucky — are calling the proposed rule “some combination of a half measure and a smoke screen.”
“Indiana will be required to stretch its scarce resources even further under the Circumvention Rule,” the lawsuit says, “because the Rule will cause an influx of aliens at the border, causing Defendant to release hundreds of thousands of aliens into the United States monthly and similarly increasing the number of aliens Defendants fail to apprehend.”
The lawsuit was filed May 31 in the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota. Defendants include the leaders of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the U.S. Department of Justice.
The eight-count lawsuit alleges the rule exceeds the defendants’ statutory authority because it violates the 2006 Secure Fence Act and because the rule’s exceptions — including the Biden administration’s existing programs for people from Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba and Haiti to come to the U.S. with advance permission — are “arbitrary and capricious.”
“In a truly Orwellian twist, the federal government has depicted this latest measure as a tool for reducing illegal immigration,” Rokita said in a statement. “As a matter of fact, this new rule would make it even easier to illegally immigrate into the United States — and everyday Hoosiers right here in Indiana would pay the price.”
Meanwhile, groups represented by the American Civil Liberties Union filed an amended complaint against the federal government for being too harsh, calling the rule convoluted and unlawful. The case originated in 2018 as a complaint against former President Donald Trump’s administration. It was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.