Home » Appellate court to hold oral arguments at DePauw

Appellate court to hold oral arguments at DePauw

| IL Staff
Keywords Indiana Court of Appeals / Oral arguments
  • Print

Related Stories

Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00
IL file photo

The Indiana Court of Appeals will head to DePauw University in September, as the court hears oral arguments in a case involving a Marion County juvenile challenging his convictions for firearm and marijuana possession.

The hearing will be held Sept. 6 at 10:30 a.m. at the Inn at DePauw in Greencastle.

According to court records, an Indianapolis police officer responding to a dispatch approached four juveniles at a picnic table in a park.
Three of the juveniles fled.
The fourth, 14-year-old A.H., was lying on top of the table. He saw the officer approaching and sat on the bench seat.
The officer saw a black hoodie on top of the table and started to move it out of the way. He felt something hard, lifted up the hoodie, and found a firearm underneath.
The officer handcuffed A.H. due to safety concerns and asked for his personal information. A.H. gave the officer a false name and a date of birth and stated that he had been arrested before in Marion County.
No records with that name were in the database. The officer believed that he had probable cause to arrest A.H., searched him, and found a lollipop wrapper containing two grams of marijuana. Three DNA profiles were found on the firearm, but A.H. was excluded as a contributor.
The state filed a petition alleging that A.H. committed dangerous possession of a firearm, a Class A misdemeanor, and possession of marijuana, a Class B misdemeanor. A.H. filed a motion to suppress the marijuana, which the juvenile court denied.
At the fact-finding hearing, the marijuana was admitted into evidence over A.H.’s objection, and the court adjudicated him delinquent on both counts.
On appeal, A.H. argued that the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he constructively possessed the firearm.
He also argued that the juvenile court committed reversible error in admitting the marijuana, claiming that it was seized during a search incident to an unconstitutional arrest.

The scheduled panelists are Judge Terry Crone, Judge Peter Foley and Judge Dana Kenworthy.

The case is A.H. v. State of Indiana, 24A-JV-370.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}