Community Health agrees to pay $345M to settle ‘false claims’ lawsuit

  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00
IL file photo

Community Health Network has agreed to pay the United States government $345 million to settle allegations that it engaged in a yearslong scheme to recruit physicians and pay them huge salaries and bonuses in return for “downstream referrals” on medical procedures.

The U.S. Department of Justice said Tuesday the agreement settles allegations that senior management at Community Health recruited hundreds of local physicians as far back as 2008 and paid them salaries that were significantly higher, sometimes double, than they were receiving in their own private practices.

Community submitted an unspecified number of claims to Medicare for services that resulted from the unlawful referrals, the Justice Department said.

That violated a federal statute known as the Stark Law, which prohibits hospitals from billing for certain services referred by physicians with whom the hospital has a financial relationship unless the physicians’ compensation are consistent with fair market value and not based on the value or volume of their referrals to the hospital.

“The Stark Law was enacted to ensure that the clinical judgment of physicians is not corrupted by improper financial incentives,” Brian Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, said in written remarks. “Today’s recovery demonstrates the Department’s resolve to protect the integrity of federal health care programs and to safeguard the taxpayer dollars used to support these important programs.”

Community officials did not immediately respond to an email and telephone call from Indianapolis Business Journal seeking comment.

Previously, it has called the government’s complaint “meritless” and said it cooperated with the investigation. It said it was disappointed that the Justice Department filed a complaint.

The scheme was brought to light with the help of Thomas Fischer, who served as Community Health’s chief financial officer from 2005 until his sudden exit in 2013. Fischer said he was fired in retaliation for repeatedly asking questions about the large salaries, which the health system continued to pay during a market downturn and cost-cutting initiative.

Fischer filed a whistleblower complaint in 2014, and the Department of Justice later intervened and took over the suit. Under federal law, Fischer stands to collect a portion of the settlement, but his share has not yet been determined, the Justice Department said.

“I am grateful for this recovery,” Fischer said in a statement Tuesday. “These claims are not mere technicalities; they directly affect patients, hospital employees and the high cost of health care. This puts money back into the health care system and is a victory for the Indiana taxpayer.”

The $345 million settlement amount is reportedly triple the amount of the largest prior Stark Law False Claims Act settlement, according to Fischer’s law firm, Joseph Greenwald & Laake P.A.

The settlement agreement could end much of the case against Community, which has dragged on for more than nine years and involved more than 700 filings in the court docket. But Fischer’s lawyers said they plan to continue to seek recovery for some issues that the Justice Department declined in its claims.

Community Health operates eight hospitals and hundreds of clinics, surgery centers and urgent-care centers.

The Justice Department had alleged that the compensation that Community paid to its cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons and breast surgeons was “well above fair market value.” It said Community awarded bonuses to physicians that were tied to the number of their referrals.

The government said Community was well aware of Stark Law requirements on physician compensation and even hired valuation firms to analyze the compensation. One of the firms, Indianapolis-based Katz Sapper & Miller, concluded that the compensation was “staggering” and “high compared to productivity in all specialties and primary care.”

The other, Chicago-based Sullivan Cotter, found that the salaries were above fair-market value and needed to be below the 75th percentile of national benchmark salary data.

Even so, Community “knowingly provided the firm with false compensation figures so that the firm would render a favorable opinion,” the Justice Department said.

“Community ignored repeated warnings from the valuation firm regarding the legal perils of overcompensating the physicians,” it added.

“Hoosier Medicare patients deserve to know that their care is based on their medical needs, not their doctor’s financial gain,” Zachary Myers, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, said in a statement. “When doctors refer patients for CT scans, mammograms, or any other service, those patients should know the doctor is putting their medical interests first and not their profit margins.”

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}