Opinions Aug. 6, 2019

Keywords Opinions
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Indiana Court of Appeals
In the Matter of: R.G. (Child) and M.M. (Mother) and M.G. (Father) v. Indiana Department of Child Services
19A-JC-598
Juvenile CHINS. Affirms the Bartholomew Circuit Court’s order adjudicating R.G. to be a child in need of services. Finds that although the trial court erred in permitting a witness for the Department of Child Services to testify telephonically at the fact-finding hearing, the error is harmless in light of other probative evidence. Also finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering parents to participate in services.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}