Opinions March 23, 2023

  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Shalee C. Dowell v. State of Indiana
19A-CR-2623
Criminal. Affirms Shalee Dowell’s conviction in the Perry Circuit Court of Level 2 felony dealing in methamphetamine. Finds the state waived any challenge to the appellate court’s decision to reassume jurisdiction of Dowell’s direct appeal. Also finds the state’s evidence was sufficient.

Hoagland Family Limited Partnership v. Town of Clear Lake (mem. dec.)
22A-PL-631
Civil plenary. Affirms the Steuben Circuit Court’s grant of the town of Clear Lake’s petition to hold Hoagland Family Limited Partnership in contempt. Finds the trial court acted within its discretion.

Laura A. Dowell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
22A-CR-1637
Criminal. Affirms Laura Dowell’s conviction for Class A misdemeanor theft. Finds Dowell’s conviction in the Marion Superior Court was supported by sufficient evidence.

Christopher Garriott v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
22A-CR-2411
Criminal. Affirms the Warren Circuit Court’s order revoking Christopher Garriott’s probation and ordering him to serve the entirety of previously suspended sentence in the Department of Correction. Finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion by ordering Garriott to serve his entire sentence.

Melissa Shebish v. Mark Murzyn (mem. dec.)
22A-ES-1572
Estate, supervised. Affirms the Lake Circuit Court’s denial of Melissa Shebish’s request for another continuance but reverses in part the judgment that Shebish was liable to her father’s estate in the amount of $256,666. Finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Shebish’s motion. Also finds that three checks included in the trial court’s judgment were improperly presumed to be invalid. Finally, finds the record does not support the award of $77,000. Remands with instructions to reduce by $9,500 the portion of the award relating to the challenged checks and to vacate the $77,000 part of the award to the estate.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}