Pennsylvania attorney receives reciprocal suspension in Indiana

  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00
IL file photo

A Pennsylvania attorney suspended in his home state has also been indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Indiana.

The Indiana Supreme Court on Friday imposed the indefinite suspension on Darren K. Parr as reciprocal discipline.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court suspended Parr for one year and one day in 2020, and he failed to notify the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, as required by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(20)(b).

The Disciplinary Commission requested reciprocal discipline, and in July, the high court issued a show-cause order that both parties responded to.

“The Court finds that there has been no showing, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(20)(e), of any reason why reciprocal discipline should not be issued in this state,” the Friday order stated.

Parr has not sought reinstatement in Pennsylvania and remains under suspension there.  If he is reinstated to practice in Pennsylvania, he may file a “Motion for Release from Reciprocal Suspension.”

The case is In the Matter of: Darren K. Parr, 23S-DI-194.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}