IndyBar: President’s Update
Thanks go to the IndyBar members that assisted the legislature with legal analysis during the recent special session.
To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
Thanks go to the IndyBar members that assisted the legislature with legal analysis during the recent special session.
See who has reached this lawyerly milestone.
As we turn the page to a new year, it’s the perfect moment to reassess how you work, what you want to achieve, and how your practice can evolve.
Several Hobart city residents have sued the city’s plan commission and city council over the rezoning of residential areas to accommodate a new proposed Amazon data center.
Six former players for the Indiana University Indianapolis men’s basketball team have sued the board of trustees and the school over alleged physical and mental abuse inflicted on them by their former head coach.
A proposed settlement agreement resolving the ethics investigation into former Indiana Secretary of Public Safety Jennifer-Ruth Green would impose a $10,000 fine and no additional penalties.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Taylor Mitchell Fischer v. State of Indiana
25A-CR-494
Criminal. Reverses Taylor Fischer’s conviction in Vanderburgh Circuit Court for neglect of a dependent as a level 1 felony and remands for a new trial on that charge. Finds that the erroneously admitted toxicology report was not harmless. Also finds that Fischer has met his burden of demonstrating how, in light of all the evidence in the case, the error’s probable impact undermines confidence in the outcome of the proceeding. Affirms Fischer’s convictions on two counts of neglect of a dependent as level 6 felonies. Attorney for appellant: Mark Leeman. Attorneys for appellee: Todd Rokita, Kathy Bradley.
Beginning Jan. 1, more than half a million low-income Indiana residents won’t be able to use government food assistance to buy sugary drinks or candy. And state officials are preparing retailers and participants for the changes.
On top of Independent Indiana’s list is eliminating straight-ticket voting in which those casting election ballots can vote for all of a party’s candidate with a single push of a button.
Indianapolis Public Schools plans on changing its policies to address a lawsuit from Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita that claims the district impeded federal immigration enforcement.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia wasn’t an activist and he didn’t choose to become locked in to what has become one of the most contentious immigration issues of the Trump administration, his lawyer told The Associated Press on Monday.
President Donald Trump on Monday blamed Rob Reiner’s outspoken opposition to the president for the actor-director’s killing, delivering the unsubstantiated claim in a shocking post that seemed intent on decrying his opponents even in the face of a tragedy.
Chanel Parker, the quality-of-life coordinator with the Marion Superior Court Youth Services Center, has been named the recipient of the Indianapolis Colts’ 2025 Inspire Change Changemaker Award.
A complaint was filed against Aylo, an adult entertainment company that owns several pornographic websites, including Pornhub, in the Marion Superior Court on Dec. 3.
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear the appeal of a Black death row inmate from Mississippi whose case was handled by a prosecutor with a history of dismissing Black jurors for discriminatory reasons.
President Donald Trump’s failed push for an Indiana congressional redistricting exposed divisions among Republicans who dominate the state Legislature and with Gov. Mike Braun.
Along with the unpredictable tariffs, stubborn inflation and weak hiring have shaken consumer confidence in the U.S. economy.
Federal prosecutors were set to start presenting their case Monday against a Wisconsin judge accused of helping a Mexican immigrant evade federal authorities.
Indiana Court of Appeals
In the Matter of the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of A.L., Mother, J.T., Father, and B.T., Child, A.L. and J.T. v. Indiana Department of Child Services
25A-JT-663
Juvenile termination of parental rights. Affirms the Jay Circuit Court’s termination of father J.T.’s parental rights. Finds the trial court’s conclusion that termination of father’s parental rights was in the child’s best interest was supported by clear and convincing evidence. Reverses the trial court’s termination of mother A.L.’s parental rights. Finds that while it is factually correct that the mother had not engaged in services from Department of Child Services, the trial court’s conclusions that the mother had not engaged in services, benefited from services, and had not improved her ability to parent the child are not supported by the evidence. Finally, finds that, by failing to present the statutory notice issue to the trial court, the father waived his argument regarding a lack of statutory notice. Remands for further proceedings. Attorneys for appellant: Joshua Brown, Ana Quirk. Attorneys for appellee: Todd Rokita, Monika Talbot.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt issued Alexander Pineda-Penaloza’s sentence, which also includes four years of supervised release.