Supreme Court rules against broad federal ban on gun ownership by marijuana users
The justices decided unanimously in favor of a man who argued that a law barring guns from anyone who regularly uses illegal drugs violates the Second Amendment.
Home » Search
Search Results
7475 results for 'articles'
To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
15 lawyers selected for inaugural class of ISBA Rural Practice Academy
The chosen lawyers will spend the next 12 months learning how to build sustainable legal practices in rural and underserved communities.
26 more plaintiffs join lawsuit against Lebanon faith-based therapy facility
CohenMalad LLP originally filed the lawsuit on behalf of nine former program residents, but on Tuesday, it added 26 more plaintiffs.
Luigi Mangione to assert psychiatric defense in murder case in UnitedHealthcare CEO’s killing
A jury that accepts such a defense would be obligated to convict Mangione of manslaughter, which carries a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison, instead of murder.
June 17, 2026
Indiana Court of Appeals
Antonio Ferguson v. State of Indiana
No. 25A-CR-608
Appeal from the Wayne Superior Court No. 1, Judge Ronald J. Moore. Antonio Ferguson appeals his conviction for Level 2 felony dealing in methamphetamine, arguing that the trial court erred by admitting the methamphetamine evidence obtained during a traffic stop, claiming it violated his constitutional rights. The state cross-argues on waiver grounds, asserting that Ferguson did not properly object to the evidence. The court concludes that Ferguson’s right to appeal was preserved despite procedural nuances, and it finds no violation of either the Fourth Amendment or Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution during the search. The court affirms Ferguson’s conviction. Judge May authored the opinion, and Judges Weissmann and DeBoer concur. Appellant’s attorney: Nathaniel S. Connor, The Law Office of Nathaniel S. Connor LLC, Winchester, Indiana. Appellee’s attorney: Office of the Indiana Attorney General.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
Most Americans see freedoms under threat but core to nation’s identity, new poll finds
According to the survey, about two-thirds of Americans view the right to vote as under some threat, while nearly half say freedom of speech is under major threat.
Prosecutors say Yorktown contractor falsified $188K in bank claims
Richard Turner, 38, of Turner Remodeling LLC is charged with nine federal counts of bank fraud.
Family sues Roman Catholic Diocese of Lafayette, alleging unaddressed bullying at Carmel school
The suit says officials failed to address repeated bullying and sexual harassment of a student at Our Lady of Mount Carmel Catholic School in Carmel.
Gov. Mike DeWine wants Ohio to abolish the death penalty, saying it is not a deterrent
The state declared execution unconstitutional in 1972, but reinstated capital punishment in 1981 under a law co-written by DeWine.
Indiana man agrees to plead guilty to wire fraud in connection with wire-selling scheme
A Seymour man who is accused of embezzling more than $202,000 from his employer has agreed to plead guilty to one count of felony wire fraud.
June 16, 2026
Indiana Court of Appeals
Andrew T. Masterson v. State of Indiana
No. 25A-CR-2176
Appeal from the Martin Circuit Court, Judge Isha E. Wright-Ryan. Affirms trial court’s ruling. The appellate court determined that Masterson violated the conditions of his community-corrections placement due to his discharge from a recovery program, despite questioning the credibility of the program’s director and ruling that the discharge was not Masterson’s fault. The judgment aligns with precedents stating that responsibility for compliance rests with the probationer, and circumstances surrounding the violation are only relevant for determining a sanction. Judge Vaidik authored the opinion, with Judges Bailey and Scheele concurring. Appellant’s attorneys: Robert T. Miles, Justin W. Roberts and David J. Noetzel, certified legal intern, Kolb Roellgen & Traylor LLP, Vincennes, Indiana. Appellee’s attorney: Office of the Indiana Attorney General.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
UPDATE: Former IU quarterback won’t play for Texas Tech after unprecedented legal fight over his eligibility for gambling
The decision came on the same day that the Indianapolis-based NCAA and Big 12 Conference filed lawsuits in different courts.
Judge tosses lawsuit challenging civil rights agency’s pullback on transgender workplace protections
Liz Theran, senior director of litigation for education and workplace justice at the National Women’s Law Center, said the organization is reviewing the decision, and “considering our options.”
Seventh Circuit Court vacates man’s 70-month sentencing for lack of explanation in determining sentence length
The circuit court said the district court clearly took into consideration the defendant’s mitigating factors when deciding where he should serve his sentence, but not in deciding how long his sentence should be.
Federal customs agents seize 1,578 fake World Cup items in Indianapolis
As soccer fans from around the world visit the United States for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers in Indy have already been on the prowl for sales of fake merchandise.
Supreme Court to decide whether criminal cases must have 12 jurors
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide whether states can use juries made up of only six people in criminal cases, instead of the usual 12.
June 15, 2026
Indiana Court of Appeals
In the Matter of the Estate of William C. Bugher (Deceased), Elnor Bugher, Appellant-Respondent v. William Mark Bugher and Robert C. Bugher, In Their Capacities as Co-Personal Representatives Herein, Appellees-Petitioners
No. 25A-EU-2826
Appeal from the Gibson Circuit Court, Special Judge Greg A. Granger. Elnor Bugher appeals the trial court’s judgment favoring William Mark and Robert C. Bugher in their capacities as personal representatives of the estate of William C. Bugher. The court reversed and remanded, determining that upon William’s death, the funds in joint accounts and the residential parcel belonged solely to Elnor, not the Estate. The court ruled that Mark and Robert failed to timely file a claim under the Nonprobate Transferees Act, which contributed to the decision to vacate the previous judgment and the order for attorney fees. Judge Brown authored the opinion, with Judges Altice and DeBoer concurring. Appellant’s attorneys: Todd I. Glass and Savannah L. Mundy, Fine & Hatfield, A Professional Corp., Evansville, Indiana. Appellees’ attorneys: Maurice E. Doll and Aaron D. Doll, Doll & Sievers Attorneys at Law LLC, Vincennes, Indiana.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
After local missing teen case, Indiana congressman aims to expand Amber Alert guidelines
U.S. House Rep. Rudy Yakym is pursuing changes after a 17-year-old girl from his home state of Indiana went missing and was later found dead.
Treasury expands bank data-sharing rules tied to Trump immigration crackdown
The Treasury Department has issued fresh guidance that lets banks rapidly share information about suspected customers.
Faegre Drinker deploys new AI tools, expands ethics training
The law firm announced Thursday that it has rolled out the AI software Harvey across the firm, saying it will boost contract analysis, due diligence, compliance and litigation.
