Indy attorney indefinitely suspended for noncooperation with the disciplinary commission
Details about the initial grievance filed against the attorney were not publicly available.
To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
Details about the initial grievance filed against the attorney were not publicly available.
The limits stem from a desire to prevent large donors from skirting caps on individual contributions to a candidate by directing unlimited sums to the party, with the understanding that the money will be spent on behalf of the candidate.
Several county prosecutors with the Association of Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys held a news conference Tuesday to strongly oppose the legislation and announce their 2026 legislative proposals to address violent crime and frequent offenders.
Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, who along with other judges had previously rejected Justice Department unsealing requests before a transparency law was passed, said the materials “do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor.”
The Senate Elections Committee approved the measure, and the bill now heads to the full Senate for a vote expected Thursday.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Matthew Dale Thies Sr. v. State of Indiana
24A-PC-2600
Post-conviction relief. Affirms the Dearborn Superior Court’s denial of Matthew Thies’ petition for post-conviction relief. Finds Thies has failed to demonstrate that a reasonable jury could have reached a different verdict but for counsels’ alleged errors. Also finds that even if trial counsels’ performance may have fallen short of ideal standards in some respects, Thies has failed to prove that he was prejudiced by the alleged errors. Finally, finds the post-conviction court, therefore, did not err in determining that Thies did not prove that he had received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Attorney for appellant: Michael Cunningham. Attorneys for appellees: Todd Rokita, Robert Yoke.
The court’s conservative majority on Monday suggested that it would overturn the 90-year-old decision that has limited when presidents can fire the board members of independent federal agencies.
About a quarter of Indiana Republican senators have not yet said how they’ll vote on a sweeping partisan redraw of the state’s congressional maps, teeing up an uncertain week for the proposal’s future.
The table game dealers and dual rate workers at the casino cast their votes to join the Teamsters Local 135 after 50 days on the picket line.
The case is moving far too slow for U.S. District Judge Kenneth Bell’s liking and he’s repeatedly asked both 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports, as well as NASCAR, to speed it up.
Meta said it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.”
At issue in the pair of combined cases before the Supreme Court is whether the president exceeded his authority by relying on a 1977 law to impose the tariffs.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Indiana State Health Commissioner, in the officer’s official capacity, and Voices for Life, Inc. v. Caitlin Bernard, M.D., and Caroline Rouse, M.D.
25A-PL-782
Civil plenary. Affirms the Marion Superior Court’s order that concluded that Caitlin Bernard and Caroline Rouse had standing as doctors to seek a declaratory judgment and were entitled to a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Indiana Health Commissioner from disclosing terminated pregnancy reports in response to any Indiana Access to Public Records Act requests. Finds the trial court did not err in concluding that the doctors have standing to seek a declaratory judgment. Also finds the absence of a patient’s name from a TPR does not make it something other than a patient medical record. Finally, finds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the doctors a preliminary injunction as to the TPRs submitted by doctors. Attorneys for appellants: Todd Rokita, James Barta, Katelyn Doering, Patrick Gillen, Benjamin Horvath. Attorneys for appellees: Tanya Pellegrini, Kathrine Jack, Stephanie Toti, Juanluis Rodriguez.
Senate President Pro Tem Rodric Bray has repeatedly declared too few senators are in support for redistricting to pass, but pressure from President Donald Trump and others continues to build.
The new dispute centers on a law that the Indiana General Assembly passed in 2024 that attempted to retroactively bar cities and counties from suing firearm manufacturers, sellers, dealers or trade associations.
The ruling upholds a preliminary injunction won by OB-GYNs Caitlin Bernard and Caroline Rouse, who sued after the state agreed to release unredacted terminated pregnancy reports — or TPRs — to an anti-abortion organization.
House Bill 1032 would disassemble the state’s two Democratic-held congressional districts in an attempt to allow Republicans to win all nine of Indiana’s U.S. House seats in the 2026 midterm elections — as sought by President Donald Trump.
It’s the latest setback for the Justice Department in its bid to prosecute the frequent political target of the Republican president.
With conservative justices in the majority, the court acted on an emergency request from Texas for quick action because qualifying in the new districts already has begun, with primary elections in March.
Indiana Court of Appeals
In the Matter of: T.F. and M.F. (Minor Children) and D.F. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services
25A-JC-1450
Juvenile CHINS. Affirms the Shelby Superior Court’s adjudication of D.F.’s children, T.F. and M.F., as children in need of services and the dispositional decree continuing their removal from her care. Finds that the mother has not demonstrated the trial court abused its discretion when adjudicating children as CHINS or entering the dispositional decree. Attorney for appellant: Cara Wieneke. Attorneys for appellee: Todd Rokita, Abigail Recker.