Supreme Court won’t reconsider ‘Tiger King’ murder-for-hire conviction
The decision means Joseph Maldonado-Passage’s conviction will stand.
To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
The decision means Joseph Maldonado-Passage’s conviction will stand.
Rush was named this month along with 29 other women who have made their mark on the state for their work in philanthropy, activism, politics, the arts and, of course, the legal profession.
The Indianapolis-based drugmaker is challenging a $183.7 million judgment in a case brought by a pharmacist who alleged Lilly made false claims about rebates to the federal Medicaid program.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Nicole Olbera, et al. v. Tiara Sykes
No. 25A-JP-2005
Juvenile. Appeal from the Marion Superior Court, Magistrate Daun A. Weliever. Reverses and remands with instructions. Holds the trial court erred in dismissing Demaj Baker’s paternity petition and in determining Sykes was the child’s legal parent because, although the marital presumption applied to Sykes as a same-sex spouse, that presumption is rebuttable and Baker presented clear and convincing evidence rebutting it by establishing his biological parentage and the absence of any enforceable sperm donor agreement relinquishing his parental rights; the court further concludes the trial court improperly treated the presumption as a rule of parentage rather than a rebuttable presumption. Judge DeBoer authored the opinion. Judges Brown and Altice concur. Appellants’ attorneys: Thomas Roberts, Roberts Law, Noblesville, Indiana; Georgia Dunkerley, Harshman Ponist Smith & Rayl, Indianapolis, Indiana. Appellee pro se: Tiara Sykes.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
The Trump administration has tapped Alexander Porter Morse as an authority in its push to upend long-settled law that virtually everyone born in the United States is a citizen.
In a letter, the group of more than 50 U.S. senators and representatives asked contractors and real estate companies for details of their roles in the $38 billion plan.
In a statement Friday, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said TSA workers “should begin seeing paychecks as early as Monday.”
International conflicts in the physical world can lead to a spike in cyberattacks — both on government entities and on private companies that don’t necessarily have any connection to the conflict itself.
Atium “Bakyne” Coly, who started at right tackle for the Boilermakers the last two seasons, sued the NCAA after the association denied his request to play one more season.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed suit against Indianapolis-based Damar Services Inc., alleging it discriminated against a job applicant because of his deafness.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Munster Medical Research Foundation, Inc. v. Melodyann Clark, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Terry F. Clark Jr., Deceased
No. 25A-CT-1827
Civil. Interlocutory appeal from the Lake Superior Court, Judge Calvin D. Hawkins. Affirms in part, reverses in part and remands. Holds the trial court did not abuse its discretion by ordering the hospital to answer the Estate’s requests for admissions because the requests were not ambiguous, were properly used to narrow issues for trial and were proportional to the needs of the case; also concludes the hospital’s objections — including claims of improper purpose and burden — were not substantially justified. However, concludes the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees and expenses without first providing an opportunity for a hearing as required by Trial Rule 37, and that the error was not harmless because the hospital was denied a meaningful opportunity to challenge the amount and reasonableness of the fees. Judge Felix authored the opinion. Judges Brown and Scheele concur. Appellant’s attorney: Adam J. Sedia, Johnson & Bell, P.C., Crown Point, Indiana. Appellee’s attorney: Daniel B. Vinovich, Hilbrich Cunningham Dobosz Vinovich & Sandoval, LLP, Highland, Indiana.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
The complaint for trademark infringement was filed in the Southern District of Indiana last week.
For many manufacturers, their most valuable IP is not something they could or even should patent but rather is the accumulated knowledge of how to run their operations better than anyone else.
The two regimes rest on fundamentally different legal foundations and policy objectives.
As with most AI, there are some positives to note, but the final product always requires lawyer intervention.
Like night vision, 3D cinema glasses or a fish finder, your new IP goggles will let you experience the world from a new perspective.
Lilly denies the claims, which are related to the labeling of a drug some 16 years ago, and has fought the use of so-called RICO statutes as the basis of the case.
The suit challenges the relationship between clients and attorneys, attorneys and artificial intelligence, and artificial intelligence and the rule of law.
The Justice Department has long prosecuted fraud nationally through its Criminal Division, but the Trump administration says the new division is needed to crack down on rampant fraud.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Robert Bruce Cole v. State of Indiana
No. 25A-CR-1996
Criminal. Appeal from the Tippecanoe Superior Court, Judge Steven P. Meyer. Affirms Cole’s conviction for Level 4 felony child molesting and habitual offender enhancement. Holds the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the victim’s forensic interview under the Protected Person Statute after finding the victim was unavailable due to serious emotional distress that would prevent him from reasonably communicating if required to testify in Cole’s presence; the court also concludes Cole waived his specific challenge to the unavailability finding by failing to raise it at trial. Chief Judge Tavitas authored the opinion. Judges Weissmann and Foley concur. Appellant’s attorney: Bruce W. Graham, Graham Law Firm P.C., Lafayette, Indiana. Appellee’s attorneys: Office of the Indiana Attorney General.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.