Search Results

Indiana Supreme Court 
Keith D. Harper v. S&H Leasing, LLC; K&K Real Estate Holdings, LLC; Thomas Hagen; Brian Brisco; and Jeremy Noetzel
26S-PL-111

Civil. Appeal from the Elkhart Superior Court, Judge Stephen R. Bowers. Affirms the trial court’s judgment awarding treble damages under the Crime Victim’s Relief Act, ruling that money does not need to be considered “special chattel” for a civil claim of criminal conversion. The Supreme Court said the definition of a crime for the purposes of a Crime Victim’s Relief Act award is limited to its statutory elements. And it concluded that Harper knowingly exerted unauthorized control over the disputed funds he transferred to his personal accounts for his benefit. Justice Slaughter authored the opinion. Chief Justice Rush and Justices Massa, Goff and Molter concur. Appellant’s attorney: Adam J. Sedia, Johnson & Bell P.C., Crown Point, Indiana. Appellees’ attorneys: James M. Lewis, Elizabeth A. Klesmith, THK Law LLP, South Bend, Indiana.

This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.

Indiana Supreme Court
Regina Geels v. Lindsay Flottemesch, Mackenzi Hatfield, and Stephanie Malinowski as Guardian for Marley Malinowski
No. 25S-PL-225

Civil. Appeal from the Allen Superior Court, Judge David J. Avery. Affirms the trial court’s imposition of a constructive trust over life-insurance proceeds in favor of the decedent’s daughters. Holds the defendant waived her Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)-preemption defense by failing to raise it at the trial-court level and could not rely on a co-defendant’s assertion of the defense or the parties’ stipulation that ERISA governed the policies; the court further concludes the trial court did not clearly err in finding a fiduciary relationship and breach of fiduciary duty, supporting imposition of a constructive trust under a clear-and-convincing-evidence standard. Justice Goff authored the opinion. Chief Justice Rush and Justice Massa and Justice Molter concur. Justice Slaughter dissents, stating he would deny transfer and allow the Court of Appeals’ decision to stand. Appellant’s attorney: Robert J. Palmer, May Oberfell Lorber, LLP, Mishawaka, Indiana. Appellees’ attorneys: Nathan S.J. Williams, Shannon K. Connors, Shambaugh Kast Beck & Williams, LLP, Fort Wayne, Indiana.

This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Justin Gordon and Kierston Cates v. Terex Corp., Terex USA LLC, Terex South Dakota Inc., Genie Industries Inc., and General Rental & Sales LLC
25A-CT-2275

Civil. Appeal from the Pike Circuit Court, Judge Evan C. Biesterveld. Affirms the trial court’s dismissal of appellants’ suit with prejudice, holding that their failure to timely submit required summonses meant the lawsuit was not properly commenced under Indiana Trial Rule 3. The court determined that appellants’ alleged right to voluntarily dismiss without prejudice was not applicable since they failed to meet the necessary requirements for adjudication. Judge Bradford authored the opinion. Judges Pyle and Kenworthy concur. Appellants’ attorneys: Jason E. Pepe, Patrick Daniel Law, Houston, Texas; Bradley P. Colborn, Colborn Law, Granger, Indiana. Appellee General Rental’s attorney: Robert R. Foos, Jr., Lewis Wagner & Trimble, Indianapolis. Appellees Terex’s attorneys: Kevin C. Schiferl, Maggie L. Smith, Jordan M. Slusher, FBT Gibbons, Indianapolis.

This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.

Indiana Court of Appeals 
V.K. and T.K. (Minor Children), Children in Need of Services, and A.R. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services
25A-JC-2395

Juvenile. Appeal from the Perry Circuit Court, Judge Lucy Goffinet. Affirms the trial court’s dispositional order requiring mother to submit to random drug screens and abstain from alcohol. Holds that the mother waived her challenge to these requirements by failing to object to the recommendations in the predispositional report during the dispositional hearing. Additionally, the court finds sufficient evidence supports the imposition of these requirements based on the parents’ history of domestic violence and substance abuse. Judge Kenworthy authored the opinion. Judges Bradford and Pyle concur.  Appellant’s attorney: Cara Schaefer Wieneke, Wieneke Law Office LLC, Brooklyn, Indiana. Appellee’s attorneys: Indiana Attorney General’s Office.

This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.