Articles

Opinions Aug. 10, 2023

7Th Circuit Court of Appeals
United States of America v. Paul Erlinger
22-1926
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division. Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson.
Criminal. Affirms Paul Erlinger’s sentence to 15 years for illegally possessing a firearm. Finds there is no basis to hold that the Indiana burglary statute no longer qualifies for an enhanced sentence mandated by the Armed Career Criminal Act. Also finds that a preponderance of the evidence shows Erlinger’s offenses were committed on separate occasions.

Read More

Opinions Aug. 9, 2023

Court of Appeals of Indiana
David W. Helvey v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
23A-CR-299
Criminal. Affirms David Helvey’s aggregate 20-month sentence for Level 6 felony intimidation and four counts of Class A misdemeanor intimidation. Finds Helvey’s sentence is not inappropriate in light of the nature of the offenses and his character.

Read More

Opinions Aug. 8, 2023

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Kurt Russell v. State of Indiana
22A-CR-2299
Criminal. Affirms Kurt Russell’s conviction of Level 1 felony dealing in a controlled substance resulting in death. Finds the Boone Superior Court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted evidence extracted from a phone other than the one found on the counter near Maxwell Timbrook’s body because the content of both phones were the same given that they were linked to the same iCloud account. Also find the state presented sufficient evidence that Russell delivered fentanyl to Timbrook, and he died ingesting the fentanyl.

Read More

Opinions Aug. 7, 2023

7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Anna Kinney v. St. Mary’s Health, Inc., doing business as St. Vincent Evansville
22-2740
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division.
Senior Judge Richard L. Young.
Civil. Affirms the grant of summary judgment to St. Mary’s Health Inc. on Anna Kinney’s Americans with Disabilities Act and Title VII claims. Finds no reasonable juror could find that Kinney could perform certain essential functions of her job without being present in the radiology department that she oversaw, so she was not a qualified individual for the job under the ADA, and even if she had been, the accommodation she requested was not reasonable. Also finds Kinney’s resignation was not a constructive discharge. Finally, regarding promotions Kinney applied for but did not receive, her claims did not show genuine issues of material fact.

Read More