Twenty states including Indiana are supporting South Carolina’s defense of a new abortion law, arguing in an amicus brief that a federal judge was wrong to pause the entire measure instead of just the provision facing a court challenge.
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Mike Butler v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
20-3187
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. Judge Damon R. Leichty.
Civil. Affirms the denial of Mike Butler’s request for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Finds the administrative law judge did not fail to consider Butler’s age. Also finds the ALJ followed the procedures that are appropriate to a case such as this one in which exertional and nonexertional impairments impede the claimant’s ability to perform some jobs within a category. Finally, finds any error in the district court’s failure to recite expert testimony as to the number of jobs available to Butler to Indiana was harmless.
A federal law that for more than 50 years has banned licensed firearms dealers from selling handguns to young adults between ages 18 and 21 is unconstitutional, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.
Indiana Court of Appeals
In re the Matter of D.L. (Minor Child), M.L. (Father) v. Indiana Department of Child Services (mem. dec.)
20A-JC-2108
Juvenile CHINS. Affirms the adjudication of father M.L.’s minor child, D.L., as a child in need of services. Finds M.L. has not established that his due process rights were violated or that the juvenile court abused its discretion when it refused to take judicial notice of his pending post-conviction relief petition. Also finds the Department of Child Services proved D.L. is a CHINS.
An Illinois church organist who claimed he was fired as part of a hostile work environment has split the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals over the interpretation of recent U.S. Supreme Court precedent as to how far the ministerial exception protects religious organizations.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Marcos Leon v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
21A-CR-107
Criminal. Affirms the sentencing order entered after Marcos Leon pleaded guilty to Level 6 felony attempted voyeurism. Finds the Vanderburgh Circuit Court’s reasoning for declining to enter Leon’s conviction as a Class A misdemeanor was based on the circumstances of the crime, not because the state objected, so Leon failed to show there is a need for a remand. Also finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Leon’s request to enter his conviction as a misdemeanor.
Indiana Court of Appeals
D.W. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
20A-JV-1811
Juvenile. Affirms the order waiving D.W. into adult court following the state’s petition alleging him to be a delinquent. Finds the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in waiving D.W. into adult court given his history of sexually abusing multiple children since 2012.
At issue is the 2015 scandal in which the automaker was found to have rigged its vehicles to cheat U.S. diesel emissions tests.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Linda G. Holsten, individually and as surviving spouse of Paul A. Holsten, Deceased v. Lynn Faur, M.D., and Cameron Memorial Community Hospital, Inc. a/k/a Urgent Care of Cameron Hospital
20A-CT-2072
Civil tort. Vacates the Steuben Circuit Court’s entry of partial summary judgment to Cameron Memorial Community Hospital on the sepsis theory of Linda Holsten’s medical malpractice complaint. Finds the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the sepsis theory portion of Holsten’s claim because it was not presented to the medical review panel. Remands with instructions for the trial court to dismiss, without prejudice, the sepsis theory portion of her claim.
The Indiana Court of Appeals on Thursday granted rehearing in an estate case to reiterate that it does not issue advisory opinions.
A sepsis theory included in a widow’s medical malpractice claim has been ordered dismissed by the Indiana Court of Appeals after it found a Steuben County court lacked jurisdiction to enter partial summary judgment on that portion of the claim.
Craig Blackwell v. Superior Safe Rooms, LLC, et al.
20A-PL-02081
Civil plenary. Reverses the denial of Craig Blackwell’s motion to pierce judgment of defendant’s – Superior Safe Rooms, LLC – corporate veil and hold garnishee defendants – Superior, Wharff Excavating, LLC, Michael M. Wharff, and John H. Byers –liable for plaintiff’s judgment. Finds the Hendricks Circuit Court erred when it failed to find as a fact that the contract for the safe room was between Blackwell and Superior, failed to make necessary findings, as requested by Blackwell, about factors relevant to disregarding Superior’s corporate form. Also finds the trial court clearly erred in concluding “Blackwell presented no evidence that any of the Aronson vs. Price, 644 N.E.2d 864, 867 (Ind. 1994)… factors CAUSED [his] damages.”
Congressional Democrats are facing renewed pressure to pass legislation that would protect voting rights after a Supreme Court ruling made it harder to challenge efforts to limit ballot access in many states.
Read Indiana appellate court decisions from the most recent reporting period.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Charles William Smith, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
20A-CR-2311
Criminal. Affirms Charles Smith Jr.’s conviction for Level 2 felony dealing in cocaine. Finds Smith unambiguously waived his right to be free from searches without reasonable suspicion as a condition of his placement in community corrections, so Marion County Community Corrections had Smith’s consent to search his residence. Also finds sufficient evidence to support the conviction.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against an Alabama inmate whose lawyers argued that his trial counsel should have done more to try to show he is intellectually disabled and therefore he should be spared a death sentence.
The U.S. Supreme Court sided Friday with members of an Amish group in Minnesota who are fighting efforts by authorities to compel them to install septic systems, sending their appeal back to a state court for reconsideration in light of the high court’s recent ruling in a religious freedom case.
The following Indiana Supreme Court opinion was posted after IL deadline on Wednesday:
Kevin Charles Isom v. State of Indiana
45S00-1508-PD-00508
Post conviction. Affirms the post-conviction court’s judgment against Kevin Isom. Finds the post-conviction court was correct to hold Isom to his burden of presenting developed legal theories and establishing the grounds for relief. Finds Isom has not established that the post-conviction court erred on multiple grounds, including in denying his renewed motion for a competency hearing; denying his discovery request for the State’s lethal-injection protocol and finding execution-validity challenge waived; denying his discovery request for juror contact information and finding issue waived; limiting the testimony of two expert witnesses; and finding his challenge to his petition’s filing date waived.
The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld voting restrictions in Arizona in a decision that could make it harder to challenge other voting measures put in place by Republican lawmakers following last year’s elections.
The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered California to stop collecting the names and addresses of top donors to charities.