Articles

judges-layers-2col.jpg

7th Circuit tosses slating system for Indy judges

Now that Indianapolis’ pay-to-play slating system that evenly divvied judgeships between Democrats and Republicans has been ruled unconstitutional, it’s up to the General Assembly to figure out how Marion County should select its judges.

Read More
rop-judicialcenter-090715-2col.jpg

Hamilton County pursuing judicial center expansion

Hamilton County officials are moving forward with an expansion plan for the county’s judicial center instead of constructing a new building east of State Road 37 — in part to keep workers and users in downtown Noblesville.

Read More
women-092315trailblazers-022-2col.jpg

Profession honors women who have blazed trails in the law

Recently, Barnes & Thornburg and the Indiana Bar Foundation honored Shirley Shideler during a special reception at the firm’s Indianapolis office to pay homage to her legacy and to recognize three women who are blazing trails of their own in the legal field.

Read More
split-092315-130737-2col.jpg

Indianapolis Mass Ave. firm splits

Although the law firm of Price Waicukauski & Riley has split, the plaintiff’s lawyers, who have successfully handled complex litigation and large class actions, say the separation is amicable and their respective practices will continue.

Read More

Opinions Sept. 21, 2015

Indiana Supreme Court
Ray Clifton v. Ruby McCammack

49S02-1504-CT-228
Civil tort. Affirms trial court grant of summary judgment in favor of motorist Ruby McCammack in a negligent infliction of emotional distress lawsuit filed by Ray Clifton, the father of a moped driver struck and killed in a crash. Clifton may not recover under the bystander rule because he does not meet the three circumstantial factors — that the scene viewed was essentially as it was at the time of the incident, that the victim was in essentially the same condition as immediately following the incident, and that the claimant was not informed of the incident before coming upon the scene.

Read More

Opinions Sept. 21, 2015 ILD

Indiana Court of Appeals

Constantine D. Mills, Jr. v. Brandy Fisher (mem. dec.)
90A05-1504-JP-176
Juvenile. Reverses modification of child support order for Mills, who is incarcerated, and was ordered to pay monthly support in excess of his income. Remands for a revised modification of the support order. Judge Patricia Riley concurs with the reversal but would not remand for a modification and would leave Mills’ monthly support obligation at $12.

Michael Lindsey v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
71A04-1412-PC-576
Post-conviction. Affirms denial of post conviction relief.

Read More

Justices decline to extend ‘bystander rule’

The father of a moped driver killed in a collision with a car may not recover on a claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Monday, declining to extend the bystander rule in such cases.

Read More

Successor owner must pay more to unemployment insurance

A buyer of an auto parts retail business that used the same name, same signs, same location, same phone number, same inventory, same fixtures, and hired some of the same employees lost his appeal to the finding that he is liable for a higher employer rate as a successor business.

Read More

Justices take appeal involving eavesdropping cops

Whether Michigan City police officers should be forbidden from testifying in a murder case because they eavesdropped on the suspect’s conversation with attorneys will be decided by the Indiana Supreme Court.

Read More

Ex-husband may argue contempt in seeking arrearage

An ex-husband who a trial court determined is owed $76,173 from his wife’s teacher retirement benefits was wrongly denied an opportunity to argue the arrearage can be pursued through contempt, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled Monday.

Read More

Opinions Sept. 18, 2015 ILD

Indiana Court of Appeals

CaNon Harper v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
10A05-1407-PC-343
Post conviction. Affirms denial of post-conviction relief.

In the Matter of the Term. of the Parent-Child Relationship of: Br. H. & Be.H. and C.H. v. The Ind. Dept. of Child Services (mem. dec.)
79A05-1412-JT-602
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.  

Robert Horner v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
71A03-1501-CR-10
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Level 6 felony intimidation and Class A misdemeanor battery.

U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee of American Homeowner Preservation Trust Series 2014A, Rex A. Wells v. Tera Klutz and Susan Orth (mem. dec.)
02A05-1503-MI-122
Miscellaneous. Reverses order denying U.S. Bank Trust’s motion to intervene as the mortgage holder of a property that was purchased at a tax sale and produced an $11,000 surplus. Remands to the trial court for proceedings to determine whether U.S. Bank Trust or the purchaser is entitled to the surplus funds.

Jonathan Finley v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
49A05-1503-CR-88
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony theft.

In the Matter of the Term. of the Parent-Child Relationship of M.C. and K.P. and C.C. v. The Ind. Dept. of Child Services (mem. dec.)

23A04-1503-JT-114
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.

In the Matter of the Term. of the Parent-child Relationship of: M.R.H. and M.M.E. and V.L.E. v. The Ind Dept. of Child Services (mem. dec.)
79A04-1502-JT-51
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.

Jevon Deandre Ollins v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
79A02-1502-CR-76
Criminal. Affirms four-year executed sentence and conviction of Class C felony battery resulting in serious bodily injury.

Marcus Hamilton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
49A05-1502-CR-76
Criminal. Affirms four-year executed sentence and conviction of Level 5 felony battery.

Read More

Opinions Sept. 18, 2015

Indiana Supreme Court
Blake Layman & Levi Sparks v. State of Indiana
20S04-1509-CR-548.
Criminal. Vacates conviction of murder and remands for entry of conviction of Class B felony burglary and for Layman and Sparks to be resentenced accordingly. Members of the “Elkhart 4,” Layman and Sparks were convicted of murder in the death of Danzele Johnson, who was shot by a homeowner whose house the suspects burglarized. There was simply nothing about the Appellants’ conduct or the conduct of their cohorts that was ‘clearly the mediate or immediate cause’ of their friend’s death, the court held.

Read More