Opinions

Indiana Court of Appeals
Carl Eugene McDonald v. State of Indiana
21A-CR-363
Criminal. Dismisses in part, affirms in part, reverses in part. Finds Carl McDonald may not challenge on direct appeal the validity of his convictions for operating a vehicle while intoxicated, endangering a person with a passenger less than e18 years old, a Level 6 felony; three counts of Level 6 felony neglect of a dependent; operating a motor vehicle without ever receiving a license, a Class C misdemeanor; and for being a habitual vehicular substance offender. Also finds that the Cass Superior Court abused its discretion in sentencing McDonald but that remand to the trial court is only necessary so that the HVSO enhancement may be attached to a specific felony. Dismisses McDonald’s double jeopardy claims without prejudice so that they may be brought through a petition for post-conviction relief. Remands with instructions to correct the abstract of judgment.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Stephen M. Davis v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
21A-CR-52
Criminal. Affirms Stephen M. Davis’ sentence to five years executed in the Department of Correction for his conviction of Level 5 felony attempted overpass mischief. Finds the Madison Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion when it sentenced Davis. Also finds Davis’ sentence is not inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and his character. Judge Elizabeth Tavitas concurs in result with separate opinion.

7^th Circuit Court of Appeals

Mike Butler v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
20-3187
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. Judge Damon R. Leichty.

Civil. Affirms the denial of Mike Butler’s request for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Finds the administrative law judge did not fail to consider Butler’s age. Also finds the ALJ followed the procedures that are appropriate to a case such as this one in which exertional and nonexertional impairments impede the claimant’s ability to perform some jobs within a category. Finally, finds any error in the district court’s failure to recite expert testimony as to the number of jobs available to Butler to Indiana was harmless.

Indiana Court of Appeals

In re the Matter of D.L. (Minor Child), M.L. (Father) v. Indiana Department of Child Services (mem. dec.)
20A-JC-2108
Juvenile CHINS. Affirms the adjudication of father M.L.’s minor child, D.L., as a child in need of services. Finds M.L. has not established that his due process rights were violated or that the juvenile court abused its discretion when it refused to take judicial notice of his pending post-conviction relief petition. Also finds the Department of Child Services proved D.L. is a CHINS.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Marcos Leon v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
21A-CR-107
Criminal. Affirms the sentencing order entered after Marcos Leon pleaded guilty to Level 6 felony attempted voyeurism. Finds the Vanderburgh Circuit Court’s reasoning for declining to enter Leon’s conviction as a Class A misdemeanor was based on the circumstances of the crime, not because the state objected, so Leon failed to show there is a need for a remand. Also finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Leon’s request to enter his conviction as a misdemeanor.

Indiana Court of Appeals

D.W. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
20A-JV-1811
Juvenile. Affirms the order waiving D.W. into adult court following the state’s petition alleging him to be a delinquent. Finds the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in waiving D.W. into adult court given his history of sexually abusing multiple children since 2012.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Linda G. Holsten, individually and as surviving spouse of Paul A. Holsten, Deceased v. Lynn Faur, M.D., and Cameron Memorial Community Hospital, Inc. a/k/a Urgent Care of Cameron Hospital
20A-CT-2072
Civil tort. Vacates the Steuben Circuit Court’s entry of partial summary judgment to Cameron Memorial Community Hospital on the sepsis theory of Linda Holsten’s medical malpractice complaint. Finds the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the sepsis theory portion of Holsten’s claim because it was not presented to the medical review panel. Remands with instructions for the trial court to dismiss, without prejudice, the sepsis theory portion of her claim.

Craig Blackwell v. Superior Safe Rooms, LLC, et al.
20A-PL-02081
Civil plenary. Reverses the denial of Craig Blackwell’s motion to pierce judgment of defendant’s – Superior Safe Rooms, LLC – corporate veil and hold garnishee defendants – Superior, Wharff Excavating, LLC, Michael M. Wharff, and John H. Byers –liable for plaintiff’s judgment. Finds the Hendricks Circuit Court erred when it failed to find as a fact that the contract for the safe room was between Blackwell and Superior, failed to make necessary findings, as requested by Blackwell, about factors relevant to disregarding Superior’s corporate form. Also finds the trial court clearly erred in concluding “Blackwell presented no evidence that any of the Aronson vs. Price, 644 N.E.2d 864, 867 (Ind. 1994)… factors CAUSED [his] damages.”

Indiana Court of Appeals
Charles William Smith, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
20A-CR-2311
Criminal. Affirms Charles Smith Jr.’s conviction for Level 2 felony dealing in cocaine. Finds Smith unambiguously waived his right to be free from searches without reasonable suspicion as a condition of his placement in community corrections, so Marion County Community Corrections had Smith’s consent to search his residence. Also finds sufficient evidence to support the conviction.

The following Indiana Supreme Court opinion was posted after IL deadline on Wednesday:

Kevin Charles Isom v. State of Indiana
45S00-1508-PD-00508
Post conviction. Affirms the post-conviction court’s judgment against Kevin Isom. Finds the post-conviction court was correct to hold Isom to his burden of presenting developed legal theories and establishing the grounds for relief. Finds Isom has not established that the post-conviction court erred on multiple grounds, including in denying his renewed motion for a competency hearing; denying his discovery request for the State’s lethal-injection protocol and finding execution-validity challenge waived; denying his discovery request for juror contact information and finding issue waived; limiting the testimony of two expert witnesses; and finding his challenge to his petition’s filing date waived.

Indiana Supreme Court
Jeffrey B. Cutchin v. Amy L. Beard
21S-CQ-48
Certified question. Finds the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act applies when a plaintiff alleges that a qualified health care provider treated someone else negligently and that the negligent treatment injured the plaintiff. Declines to answer the question of whether the act prohibits the Patient’s Compensation Fund from contesting the act’s applicability to a claim after the claimant concludes a court-approved settlement with a covered health care provider. Justice Steven David concurs in result with separate opinion.

Indiana Supreme Court
Russell G. Berg v. Stacey L. Berg
21S-DC-320
Domestic relations with children. Affirms the award of half of Russell Berg’s stock to his ex-wife Stacey Berg. Finds that documents produced in anticipation of mediation fall under the confidentiality requirement of settlement negotiations. Also finds that the Allen Circuit Court erroneously admitted a marital balance sheet prepared for mediation to allow Stacey to avoid the parties’ settlement agreement. Finally, finds the trial court incorrectly determined that fraud, constructive fraud, mutual mistake or representation had occurred, but did not abuse its discretion in finding that Russell breached the warranty clause of the agreement.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Krause-Franzen Farms, Inc., David P. Krause, Jane E. Krause, and Philip C. Krause v. Tippecanoe School Corporation
21A-PL-115
Civil plenary. Affirms the Tippecanoe Superior Court’s order in favor of Tippecanoe School Corporation on its condemnation action and overruling Krause-Franzen Farms Inc., David P. Krause, Jane E. Krause and Philip C. Krause’s objection. Finds TSC is not appropriating property because it might wish to use the property in the future. Also finds the evidence does not point solely to a conclusion that TSC has exceeded its authority.

Michael R. Jent v. Bureau Of Motor Vehicles (mem. dec.)
20A-CT-02096
Civil tort. Affirms the dismissal of Michael Jent’s complaint against the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles. Finds any error committed by the Marion Superior Court in granting the BMV’s motion to dismiss Jent’s complaint with prejudice was harmless.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Kennic T. Brown v. State of Indiana
20A-CR-2261
Criminal. Affirms the denial of Kennic Brown’s motion to dismiss his charge of Level 6 felony battery against a public safety officer. Finds the disciplinary action taken by the Indiana Department of Correction against Brown for his conduct violation does not preclude the state’s criminal prosecution of him for the same act. Also finds Brown’s motion to dismiss the criminal charge against him on double jeopardy grounds was correctly denied.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Thomas D. Hunter v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
20A-PC-1293
Post-conviction. Affirms the denial of Thomas Hunter’s petition for post-conviction relief following his guilty plea to felony murder. Finds Hunter failed to prove he was denied due process based on an alleged Brady violation or that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

Indiana Supreme Court
State of Indiana v. Justin Jones
21S-CR-50
Criminal. Reverses an order requiring a confidential informant in Justin Jones’ case to have a face-to-face interview with opposing counsel. Finds that an informant’s identity is inherently revealed through their physical appearance at a face-to-face interview. Also finds that when a defendant requests such an interview, the state has met its threshold burden to show the informer’s privilege applies. Finally, finds the Marion Superior Court did not apply the established balancing test before ordering disclosure. Remands.

Indiana Court of Appeals
David K. and Jane A. Burton, et al. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Madison County, and Lone Oak Solar, LLC
20A-MI-2186
Miscellaneous. Affirms the denial of neighbors David and Jane Burton, Bob and Jean Mills, Curtis and Rebecca Harrison, Kara and Richard Brown, Ross and Katrina Hunter, Joshua Hiday, John Doe and Jane Doe’s petition for judicial review in favor of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Madison County and Lone Oak Solar Energy LLC. Finds the votes of BZA members Mary Jane Baker and Beth VanSickle in favor of Lone Oak were valid and that there was substantial evidence to support Lone Oak’s special use applications and setback variances.

Opinions June 18, 2021 Indiana Court of Appeals A.C. James, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) 19A-PC-2311 Post-conviction. Affirms the denial of A.C. James Jr.’s petition for post-conviction relief. Finds the errors he alleged do not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel. Marq Hall v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) 19A-PC-2919 Post-conviction. Affirms the […]

Indiana Supreme Court
City of Marion v. London Witte Group, LLC, Chad Seybold, Estate of Michael Y. An, Global Investment Consulting, Inc., and World Enterprise Group, Inc.
20S-MI-00567
Miscellaneous. Affirms and reverses in part the grant of summary judgment to London Witte Group in a dispute with the city of Marion. After applying the adverse domination doctrine, finds summary judgment was inappropriate for all of the city of Marion’s claims because there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether former Mayor Wayne Seybold adversely dominated the city, and whether London Witte Group helped him do so. Remands for further proceedings.