Opinions

Indiana Court of Appeals 
Jabreeh Cash Davis-Martin v. State of Indiana
71A05-1712-CR-2963
Criminal. Affirms Jabreeh Cash Davis-Martin’s murder conviction and his 65-year sentence. Finds the delayed admission of cellphone records was not a Brady violation. Also finds the St. Joseph Superior Court did not err in instructing the jury, and the state did not violate Davis-Martin’s Fifth Amendment rights. Finally, finds there was sufficient evidence to support Davis-Martin’s conviction, and his sentence is not inappropriate. 

7th Circuit Court of Appeals 
Mack Sims v. William Hyatte
18-1573
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr.
Civil. Reverses the denial of Mack Sims’ habeas petition. Finds the state committed a Brady violation when it withheld evidence that the victim, Shane Carey, identified Sims after being hypnotized. Judge Amy Coney Barrett dissents with separate opinion. 

Indiana Court of Appeals
John L. Solomon v. State of Indiana
18A-CR-2041
Criminal. Affirms John Solomon’s conviction of Class B misdemeanor possession of marijuana, finding that the conviction is not a violation of his rights to liberty and pursuit of happiness under Article 1, Section 1 of the Indiana Constitution.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Robert Walker and Patricia Walker v. Megan (Buckner) Knight; Robert Walker and Patricia Walker v. Ashley Erin Carpenter
18A-MI-1768
Miscellaneous. Reverses the summary judgment orders entered in Hamilton Superior Court in favor of Megan Knight and Ashley Carpenter on Robert and Patricia Walker’s petition for grandparent visitation with C.W. and J.W. Finds the parties’ agreement to wait until stepfather’s adoptions were finalized before discussing grandparent visitation matters to be clear, unambiguous and fully understood by all parties. Remands for further proceedings on the petitions for grandparent visitation.

Indiana Court of Appeals 
C.S. v. T.K.
18A-PO-1566
Protection order. Reverses the Howard Superior Court’s issue of a protective order for T.K. against C.S. Finds there is insufficient evidence to support the issuance of the protective order and a finding of stalking, as only one of three encounters between T.K. and C.S. included sufficient evidence of harassment. 

The following opinions were posted after IL deadline Friday:
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Brenda Lear Scheidler v. State of Indiana, et al.
17-2543
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil. Affirms the grant of summary judgment for the state of Indiana on Brenda Lear Scheidler’s claims of sex- and disability-based discrimination and failure to accommodate and full summary judgment to Indiana Department of Insurance Commission Stephen W. Robertson, and the exclusion of evidence related to Donna Thomas. Finds the district court did not commit reversible error.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Morgan K. Govan v. State of Indiana
18A-CR-708
Criminal. Affirms Morgan K. Govan’s conviction of possession of cocaine or narcotic drug as a Level 4 felony, the determination that he is a habitual offender and his aggregate 30-year and 183-day sentence. Finds the Allen Superior Court did not err in admitting into evidence the heroin found on Govan after his arrest. Also finds any abuse of the trial court’s sentencing discretion was harmless because Govan’s sentence is not inappropriate.

The following Indiana Supreme Court opinion was posted after IL deadline Wednesday:
Q.D.-A., Inc. v. Indiana Department of Workforce Development
19S-EX-43
Agency action. Reverses the finding that Q.D.-A. should have classified its driver as an employee, not an independent contractor. Finds the liability administrative law judge unreasonably concluded the driver was Q.D.-A.’s employee under the Unemployment Compensation Act when the driver was not under Q.D.-A.’s control or direction, performed a service outside Q.D.-A.’s usually course of business and ran an independently established business. Justice Geoffrey Slaughter concurs in result without separate opinion.

The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinions were posted after IL deadline Tuesday:
Charlotte Robinson and Bobby Don Bowersock as co-personal representatives of the Estate of Georgia J. Bowersock, deceased, and Mark Bowersock, individually v. Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
17-2068
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Larry J. McKinney.
Civil. Affirms the grant of summary judgment to Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc. on a claim brought by the estate of Georgia Bowersock, who died after a Bard-manufactured surgical mesh patch was implanted in her body. Finds the novel theory of causation presented by the estate’s expert was not peer-reviewed, professionally presented, consistent with Bowersock’s medical records or autopsy or substantiated by other cases. Also finds the judge did not abuse his discretion in excluding the expert testimony.

Indiana Court of Appeals 
In the Matter of L.N., Jr., a Child Alleged to be a Child in Need of Services; C.N. (Mother) and L.N., Sr. (Father) v. Indiana Department of Child Services
18A-JC-1666
Juvenile CHINS. Reverses the Allen Superior Court’s adjudication of L.N.,Jr. as a child in need of services. Finds there is insufficient evidence to prove that L.N., Jr. was seriously endangered as a result of his parents’ mental health issues. Also finds that future concerns for his safety are not enough to support a CHINS determination. 

Indiana Court of Appeals 
Buddy & Pals III, Inc., Buddy & Pals II, Inc., Buddy & Pals Inc., Timothy Heidbreder, and William Frank Bailey, Jr. v. Christopher Falaschetti
18A-CT-1811
Civil tort. Affirms the denial of summary judgment to Buddy & Pals III, Inc. on Christopher Falaschetti’s negligence claim after he was punched by William Bailey upon Bailey’s ejection from the bar. Finds the bar had a duty to take precautions to protect its other patrons because Bailey’s violence was foreseeable. 

Indiana Court of Appeals
Danny L. Saintignon v. State of Indiana
18A-CR-279
Criminal. Affirms Danny Saintignon’s convictions of Class A felony conspiracy to commit burglary resulting in bodily injury, murder and Class B felony robbery resulting in bodily injury. Finds the Delaware Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded Saintignon’s proposed witnesses, nor did it deprive him of his right to present a defense. Also finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted a photograph that depicted Saintignon’s tattoos. Finally, finds there is sufficient evidence to support his convictions beyond a reasonable doubt. 

The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Tuesday: 
William Rainsberger v. Charles Benner
17-2521
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge William T. Lawrence. 
Civil. Affirms the district court’s denial of Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Detective Charles Benner’s motion for summary judgment against William Rainsberger, arguing that he is entitled to qualified immunity in Benner’s civil rights case alleging wrongful arrest. Holds that Benner is not entitled to qualified immunity because it is clearly established that the Fourth Amendment is violated when an officer chooses “to use deliberately falsified allegations to demonstrate probable cause.” 

Indiana Court of Appeals
Randall Brown v. State of Indiana
18A-CR-1
Criminal. Affirms on interlocutory appeal the Brown Circuit Court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence retrieved from a locked safe after defendant Randall Brown provided the combination to officers executing a search warrant. Finds officers’ failure to provide Brown a Pirtle warning before he provided the combination to a safe in his home is irrelevant. Remands for proceedings in Brown’s case, in which he is charged with Level 2 felony dealing in methamphetamine, Level 6 felony possession of methamphetamine and Level 6 felony maintaining a common nuisance.

Indiana Court of Appeals 
In the Matter of the Commitment of C.N.; C.N. v. Eskenazi Health/Midtown CMHC
18A-MH-641
Mental health. Reverses the order for C.N.’s involuntary regular civil commitment. Finds there was insufficient evidence to prove C.N. was “gravely disabled.” Remands for the Marion Superior Court to vacate the order of regular commitment. 

Indiana Court of Appeals 
RCM Phoenix Partners, LLC v. 2007 East Meadows, LP
18A-PL-1355
Civil Plenary. Affirms the Marion Superior Court’s denial of RCM Phoenix Partners’ slander of title claim against 2007 East Meadows, LP. Phoenix sued for slander of title to the apartment property it was trying to sell after Meadows filed a lis pendens notice. Finds that although Meadows did not raise the argument of privilege at the trial court, it was not barred from making that argument on appeal because it was seeking to affirm the trial court’s judgment. Also finds Meadows’ properly filed lis pendens notice was “absolutely privileged’ and Meadows cannot be held liable for slander of title.  

Indiana Court of Appeals
State of Indiana v. Michael Dwayne Bouye
18A-CR-1730
Criminal. Reverses the Marion Superior Court’s grant of Michael Bouye’s motion to suppress, finding there was reasonable suspicion for the police officer to pull over the car he was driving. Notes that despite the trial court’s statements, the officer had no obligation to conduct further license plate checks. Remands for further proceedings.

Indiana Supreme Court
J.W. v. State of Indiana
19S-JV-12
Juvenile. Grants transfer and dismisses without prejudice. Holds juveniles cannot immediately challenge on direct appeal any errors concerning their agreed delinquency adjudication. Finds that because juveniles are not eligible for post-conviction relief, they must assert any claims of error concerning their agreed judgment in a request for post-judgment relief filed with a juvenile court before pursuing their constitutional right to appeal. Also finds that juveniles who seek relief in post-judgment proceedings have a statutory right to counsel under Indiana Code article 31-32. Remands for proceedings.

Indiana Court of Appeals 
In the Matter of J.S. and M.S. (Minor Children), Children in Need of Services, and P.W. (Mother) and J.W. (Stepfather) v. Indiana Department of Child Services (mem. dec.)
18A-JC-1791
Juvenile CHINS. Affirms the adjudication of P.W. and J.W.’s two sons, J.S. and M.S., as children in need of services. Finds there is sufficient evidence to support the CHINS determination. Also finds of P.W. and J.W were not denied due process concerning J.S.’s placement.

Indiana Court of Appeals 
In the Matter of J.K., Child in Need of Services and C.K. (Mother) v. The Indiana Department of Child Services (mem. dec.)
18A-JC-1698
Juvenile CHINS. Reverses and remands the Randolph Circuit Court’s adjudication of J.K. as a child in need of services. Finds the trial court erred when it denied mother C.K.’s motion to dismiss the CHINS petition because too many days passed between the filing of the petition and the court’s hearing. Remands for the trial court to dismiss the CHINS petition without prejudice.