Opinions

The following Indiana Supreme Court opinion was posted after IL deadline Tuesday:
In the Matter of Robert John Wray
02S00-1511-DI-648
Disciplinary. Suspends Robert John Wray from the practice of law in Indiana for at least nine months without automatic reinstatement. Finds Wray engaged in attorney misconduct arising from his solicitation of clients through a nonlawyer intermediary. Justice Christopher Goff, who was the hearing officer in this discipline case, did not participate.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Craig D. Severance and Catherine Severance v. The Pleasant View Homeowners Association, Inc.
29A02-1708-PL-1695
Civil plenary. Reverses the denial of Craig and Catherine Severance’s request for damages and the denial of the Pleasant View Homeowners Association, Inc.’s request for a permanent injunction against the Severances. Finds the Hamilton Superior Court’s judgment contained erroneous findings and conclusions that limited the issues available for its consideration. Remands for further proceedings.

Indiana Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Involuntary Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of: N.R.V. (Minor Child) and N.M.V. (Mother) v. The Indiana Department of Child Services (mem.dec.)
45A05-1709-JT-2211
Juvenile termination of parental rights. Affirms the termination of N.M.V.’s parental rights to N.R.V. Finds the evidence is sufficient to support the juvenile court’s order termination N.M.V.’s parental rights.

Indiana Supreme Court
Jacob O. Robinson v. State of Indiana
18S-CR-33
Criminal. Affirms Jacob Robinson’s convictions of attempted residential entry as a Class D felony, resisting law enforcement as a Level 6 felony and his admission to being a habitual substance offender, as well as his three-year sentence on the attempted residential entry charge. Finds the Floyd Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Robinson’s motion for a continuance. Also finds Robinson’s sentence for attempted residential entry is not inappropriate.

Indiana Court of Appeals
D.Z. v. State of Indiana
32A05-1708-JV-1907
Juvenile. Reverses D.Z.’s delinquency adjudication for an act that would have been criminal mischief as a Class B misdemeanor if committed by an adult. Finds the juvenile court abused its discretion when it admitted D.Z.’s incriminating statements to a school official, who was working in cooperation with law enforcement. Judge John Baker concurs with separate opinion. Judge Elain Brown dissents with separate opinion.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Jason H. Bader v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
79A02-1706-CR-1404
Criminal. Affirms Jason H. Bader’s 22-year aggregate sentence, with 16 years in the Indiana Department of Correction, four years in community corrections and two years suspended to probation, for his convictions of dealing in methamphetamine, dealing in a synthetic drug or lookalike substance and possession of paraphernalia. Finds Bader has not sustained his burden of establishing his sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and his character.

Indiana Court of Appeals

City of Hammond v. Herman & Kittle Properties, Inc.
49A04-1612-PL-2784
Civil plenary. Reverses the grant of summary judgment in favor of Herman & Kittle Properties, Inc. on the City of Hammond’s complaint for declaratory judgment alleging violations of Article 4, Sections 22 and 23 of the Indiana Constitution. Finds Indiana Code section 36-1-20-5 must be stricken in its entirety. Remands for further proceedings.

Indiana Court of Appeals

In the Matter of E.Y., Child in Need of Services, and U.F. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services
49A02-1707-JC-1634
Juvenile CHINS. Reverses the adjudication of U.F.’s son, E.Y., as a child in need of services. Finds the Marion Superior Court clearly erred when it found E.Y. to be a CHINS. Judge Michael Barnes dissents with separate opinion.

Indiana Supreme Court

Billy Brantley v. State of Indiana
18S-CR-98
Criminal. Grants transfer and affirms Billy Brantley’s conviction of voluntary manslaughter. Finds there was evidence Brantley acted in either sudden heat or self-defense.

Indiana Supreme Court
Mathew W. McCallister v. State of Indiana
87S00-1609-LW-497
Life without parole. Affirms Mathew McCallister’s convictions of murder and conspiracy to commit murder and his sentence to life without parole. Finds McCallister’s convictions were supported by sufficient evidence. Also finds the Warrick Superior Court did not commit reversible error in admitting evidence. Finally, finds McCallister’s LWOP sentence is neither unlawful nor improper.

Indiana Supreme Court
Don H. Gunderson and Bobbie J. Gunderson, Co-Trustees of the Don H. Gunderson Living Trust v. State of Indiana, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Alliance for the Great Lakes, et al.
46S03-1706-PL-423
Civil plenary. Affirms the LaPorte Superior Court’s ruling that the state holds title to the Lake Michigan shores in trust for the public. Reverses the trial court’s decision that private property interests here overlap with those of the state. Finds the boundary separating public trust land from privately-owned riparian land along the shores of Lake Michigan is the common-law ordinary high water mark and, absent legislative conveyance, the state retains exclusive title up to that boundary. Justice Geoffrey Slaughter did not participate.

The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Monday:
David Thorne v. Member Select Insurance Company
17-1377
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division. Magistrate Judge John. E. Martin.
Civil. Affirms the denial of Member Select Insurance Company’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. Finds there was sufficient evidence to prove David Thorne was a resident of the house for purposes of his insurance policy. Also finds there was sufficient evidence for the jury to determine damages, and the district court did not misinterpret the policy’s loss coverage provision in evaluating whether the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s damages award.

7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Vexol, S.A. de C.V. and Sergio Torreblanca Lopez v. Berry Plastics Corporation
17-2164
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt.
Civil. Affirms the district court’s dismissal of Vexol, S.A. de C.V. and Sergio Torreblanca Lopez’s business tort claims under Mexican law. Denies Berry Plastics Corporation’s motion for sanctions against Vexol. Finds Vexol failed to allege any wrongdoing in Mexico by Berry. Also finds the district court did not err in denying Vexol’s motion to file a third amended complaint. Finally, finds Berry failed to file a separate motion for sanctions, as is required under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Kelly Bagsby and Aaron Bagsby v. Riley T. Snedeker
79A02-1706-CT-1315
Civil tort. Affirms the grant of Riley T. Snedeker’s motion to transfer venue. Finds the Tippecanoe Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion when it granted Snedeker’s motion.

The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Wednesday:
National Foundation for Special Needs Integrity, Inc. v. Devon Reese, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Theresa A. Givens.
17-1817
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt.
Civil. Reverses the district court’s ruling in favor of the National Foundation for Special Needs Integrity, Inc. in its dispute with Devon Reese as personal representative of the Estate of Theresa A. Givens. Finds Givens’ trust agreement is ambiguous on the question of the beneficiary of the trust. Also finds the overwhelming weight of evidence shows Givens intended for any remaining assets to pass to her children, rather than to the Foundation. Remands for entry of judgment for the estate and for an award of damages and prejudgment interest in favor of the estate.

The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Tuesday:
Terry Davis v. David Mason and Blake Thrasher
16-2707
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt.
Civil. Vacates the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of prison guards David Mason and Blake Thrasher on Terry Davis’ claims they violated his Eighth Amendment rights. Finds the evidence in the summary judgment record does not clearly show Davis failed to exhaust available administrative remedies. Remands for further proceedings.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Janet Freels v. James F. Koches and Sunset Builders, Inc.
91A02-1708-PL-1988
Civil plenary. Affirms the dismissal of Janet Freels’ complaint against James F. Koches and Sunset Builders, Inc. Declines Freels’ request to exempt small-claims proceedings from the doctrine of res judicata. Finds Freels’ additional claims should have been litigated in her first action. Also finds Freels’ second action is barred under the doctrine of claim preclusion.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Fort Wayne Community Schools and Jacalyn Butler v. Steffanie Haney, for next friend and minor daughter, M.H.
02A03-1708-CT-1829
Civil tort. Reverses the partial denial of Fort Wayne Community Schools and Jacalyn Butler’s motion for summary judgment on Steffanie Haney’s complaint alleging battery against her daughter M.H. and a violation of M.H.’s Fourth Amendment rights. Finds Fort Wayne Community Schools was entitled to summary judgment on the state law battery tort claim because as a matter of law, Butler’s alleged conduct falls within the scope of her statutory qualified immunity as a teacher managing a classroom. Also finds Haney failed to show Butler’s conduct could have violated a clearly established right. Remands.

The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Thursday:

Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH v. Biomet, Inc., et al., and Esschem, Inc.
17-1674
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr.
Civil. Affirms the denial of Heraeus Kulzer’s three motions to modify the district court’s protective orders in his case against Biomet, Inc. Finds the 7th Circuit lacks jurisdiction to review the first two orders because Heraeus Kulzer failed to timely appeal those orders. Also finds the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Haraeus Kulzer’s request to impose restrictions on Biomet’s internal use of the documents it produced subject to the third protective order.